Recomark vs Profound
Both measure whether AI assistants recommend your brand. This page is the honest version: what Profound does better, what we do better, and who should pick which. Prices checked August 2026 — prices are not published; figures from third-party reviews.
| Recomark | Profound | |
|---|---|---|
| Free check | Yes — no card, no trial clock | Free AEO report, then demo-led sales |
| Entry price | $49/mo | $99/mo |
| Mid tier | $99/mo | $399/mo |
| AI engines | ChatGPT and Google-grounded Gemini | ChatGPT only on entry, 3 engines on Growth, up to 10 on Enterprise |
| Questions per report | 20 buyer questions | — |
| Ready-to-publish fix pack | Yes — answers and schema in every paid report | No |
| Margin of error shown | Yes | — |
Where Profound is better
- Far more engines once you pay for them — ten on Enterprise against our two.
- Enterprise footing: $35M raised, dedicated support, procurement paperwork, the things a large brand's legal team asks for.
- Much larger sampling volume, so their numbers move less between runs.
Where Recomark is better
- You get the fix, not only the measurement — ready-to-publish answers and schema in every paid report.
- Self-serve from the first minute. No demo call to see your own score.
- $49 against $99 to start, and our entry tier already covers both engines.
Which one to pick
If you are an enterprise brand with a procurement process and budget for ten engines, Profound is built for you. If you are a small team or an agency that needs to know what's wrong and ship the fix this week, the extra $50 a month buys you paperwork you don't need.
See your own score first
Free check, no card. You get your AI Recommendation Score and the brands AI names ahead of you — then decide whether any of this is worth paying for, to us or to anyone else.
Check my brand — free